百度检索结果：

相关文章：
如是我闻：人民网微博出现用户“胡 锦涛”
如是我闻：名为“胡锦涛”的人民 微博已关闭

作为对比，在google.com上检索的结果：

关键词：baidu, censorship, google, 搜索引擎

相关文章

• 如是我闻：谷歌要走了？ (3)
• 900916，我是谁？ (17)
• 伊空格利，究竟为什么？ (6)
• 什么也连不上 (10)
• 与时俱进的SEO：Search Engine Omission？ (28)
• 三鹿奶粉危机事件：一种传播腐败？[转载] (8)
• 七日乱弹 (0)
• 搜呀搜，搜到一个小狗狗…… (0)

We launched Google.cn in January 2006 in the belief that the benefits of increased access to information for people in China and a more open Internet outweighed our discomfort in agreeing to censor some results. At the time we made clear that “we will carefully monitor conditions in China, including new laws and other restrictions on our services. If we determine that we are unable to achieve the objectives outlined we will not hesitate to reconsider our approach to China.”

These attacks and the surveillance they have uncovered–combined with the attempts over the past year to further limit free speech on the web–have led us to conclude that we should review the feasibility of our business operations in China. We have decided we are no longer willing to continue censoring our results on Google.cn, and so over the next few weeks we will be discussing with the Chinese government the basis on which we could operate an unfiltered search engine within the law, if at all. We recognize that this may well mean having to shut down Google.cn, and potentially our offices in China.

The decision to review our business operations in China has been incredibly hard, and we know that it will have potentially far-reaching consequences. We want to make clear that this move was driven by our executives in the United States, without the knowledge or involvement of our employees in China who have worked incredibly hard to make Google.cn the success it is today. We are committed to working responsibly to resolve the very difficult issues raised.

关于所遭受到的黑客攻击，Google是这么说的：

We have evidence to suggest that a primary goal of the attackers was accessing the Gmail accounts of Chinese human rights activists. Based on our investigation to date we believe their attack did not achieve that objective. Only two Gmail accounts appear to have been accessed, and that activity was limited to account information (such as the date the account was created) and subject line, rather than the content of emails themselves.

Google认为还有其他20家公司遭遇了攻击：

As part of our investigation we have discovered that at least twenty other large companies from a wide range of businesses–including the Internet, finance, technology, media and chemical sectors–have been similarly targeted. We are currently in the process of notifying those companies, and we are also working with the relevant U.S. authorities.

关于Google这次摊牌的后果，我跟Keso的看法类似，不认为接下来它与中国政府的商榷会形成所谓的“ an unfiltered search engine within the law”的基础。Keso说：

我相信，Google的这份摊牌声明，也会被看做一种意识形态的花招，招致中国政府更大的愤怒。在未来的岁月中，我可能不得不费更大的力气去访问那些我已经无法离开的Google工具，这是我必须承受的后果。

我现在开始担忧我所用的gmail、google apps等服务了，其次还有google docs, readers及其他。个人的力量是如此渺小，在突如其来的变化之前，除了仓皇应对，可以做的又还有什么呢？

关键词：censorship, google, regulation

相关文章

• “法律法规和政策” (1)
• 从“切实主导新媒体时代大众话语的议题设置”说开去 (0)
• 什么也连不上 (10)
• 举而报之·清洁一切·我们都是bubble boy～ (2)
• 七日乱弹 (0)
• 水木清华BBS转为“校内交流平台”一周年 (4)
• 水木垂死 之 明天会怎样？ (1)
• 水木垂死 之 十年生死两茫茫 (1)

关键词：censorship, 屏蔽, 互联网

相关文章

• 如此和谐 (22)
• 从民调数据看“互联网总统”的迷思（系列之四） (2)
• 欢迎来到五毛时代 (20)
• 感到荒谬之后 (16)
• 如是我闻：中国政府不害怕互联网 (15)
• 如是我闻：常州“市长与网民”的网上互动 (4)
• 如是我闻：谷歌要走了？ (3)
• 奥巴马是“互联网总统”吗？（系列之一） (5)

The northern building of the new CCTV complex was caught fire on Feb. 9, at around 8:00pm. The fire spread quickly and soon the entire structure was in flames.

The 44-storey building, about 200 meters from the iconic CCTV tower, houses the Television Culture Center (TVCC), the luxury Mandarin Oriental Hotel and an electronic data processing center.

According to Juliet Ye of WSJ, “people packed China’s online forums and blogs, uploaded pictures taken from the fiery scene and hit the streets to conduct their own reporting.” You can also find some collections in Danwei, or CNReviews, and “A Photo Play Of The CCTV Fire”, from ESWN. Click here to see the video filmed by BBC staffs.

The incident hasn’t been featured all that prominently on news portal front pages. An unproven guideline on the fire report was distributed online,

“All networks:

Regarding the “CCTV New North Side Building on Fire” report, all sites must use only the Xinhua news script. Do not post pictures, videos; do not report in depth; only post in Domestic (Chinese) news; close all posts and replies; do not put this as the “top topic”; do not place this in “Recommended Articles”.” — source: CNReviews.com

It turned out that CCTV itself is responsible for Monday’s massive fire (via China Daily). At the day after the fire, an office director at CCTV and 11 others have been detained by the Beijing police for questioning, according to state news agency Xinhua. Chinese continued to dissect the event online with a sardonic tilt. See EEO’s story about Chinese online reaction.

Via China Digital Time,

China’s young and hottest blogger Han Han (韩寒) took fire at CCTV once again. This blogpost, written on Feb. 11, has once again been deleted from his Sina blog, but remains on the recently “resurrected” Bullog International website (hosted in United States.) The witty, sarcastic content is being re-posted by thousands of netizens within the Great Firewall.

You can find Han Han’s article in English (translated by CDT) in the link above.

The China Blog of TIME, “The Problem With CCTV” mentioned a pointed critique of one recent CCTV program after the fire.

Publishing still hot

China Daily says, Publishing still hot on bourses,

If you think the publishing industry is going irreversibly downhill in this Internet age, think again. It is fast becoming one of the hottest sectors in the Chinese stock market, thanks to government support, in a big way.

The State Council issued a new provision last year to support development of the culture industry. It is believed that the policy has underscored the future profits and development of publishing companies. Below is another news about publishing industry in China, “Media reform in China by the end of 2010, says GAPP”,

“By the end of 2010, all for-profit news media and publishing entities will be decoupled from the government institutions they are affiliated with and transformed into separate companies. The government will no longer place restrictions on them in terms of ISBN numbers, publication licenses, and content.”

Journalist “black list”

Via Reuters,

Li Dongdong, a deputy chief of the General Administration of Press and Publication, told officials that proposed strengthened regulations for Chinese journalists would include a “full database of people who engage in unhealthy professional conduct”, the China News Service reported.

“People entered into the transgressor list will be excluded from engaging in news reporting and editing work,” the report said, citing Li.

Other links you might be interested in

• Danwei: Hoax dictionary entries about legendary obscene beasts
• Danwei: Youku’s plans for 2009
• MacKinnon’s Research Paper: China’s Censorship 2.0: How companies censor bloggers

关键词：cctv, censorship, cmd, 火灾, GAPP, Internet, publishing, tvcc

相关文章

• China Media Digest 0902 (week5-6) (1)
• China Media Digest 0901 (week1-4) (0)
• 如此和谐 (22)
• 如是我闻：元宵节不得不折腾 (1)
• CCTV.com获得北京奥运互联网与手机平台独家转播权（中国大陆及澳门） (2)
• 什么也连不上 (10)
• 互联网让你孤独了吗？ (13)
• 举而报之·清洁一切·我们都是bubble boy～ (2)

The report is released by NetEase.com, Inc. (163.com,网易), one of the leading Internet technology companies in China, in January, 2009. The report includes an annual top-10 ranking of Internet Hot Figures, Internet Hot Key Words, Entertainment Stars, Sports Persons, Entrepreneurs, Hot Movies, Hot Music Singles, Hot TV series, Fund companies, and A-share listed companies. The report summarizes facts of maximum interest to Chinese netizens in these ten fields as well as highlights common features and the latest status of such information. According to the report,

Who determines the report result? There are about 200 million netizens in China who are active in the application of various NetEase Internet products. They come from different regions of China and are engaged in different industries, but every click or search they have done, and any words they have posted on the Internet, have contributed to this report.

How was the data analyzed? The data was analyzed by collecting original data from five system platforms of NetEase, i.e., NetEase Blog, NetEase BBS, Youdao Search Engine, Netease Channels, and NetEase Posts. Such data were then used for linear conversion and linear transformation by standard statistical methods without changing the data order or distribution form. This produced a normal status measure, called the Internet transmission index, for each respective collection item.

It’s really worth reading if you are interested in the culture of China society and Chinese cyberspace. Just click the links to download the English version and Chinese version. Other related links:

• Netease: The feature page of the report (in Chinese)
• Yahoo: NetEase Releases 2008 China Internet Communication Report

Film ratings system: news, fake news or “old news” ?

Tong Gang in 2004

From Danwei:

On February 2, Beijing Business Today ran a report under the headline “Tong Gang: A film ratings system will not permit Cat-III films.” The article reported that China had completed work on a law that would implement a film ratings system without opening the door to porn, and featured extensive quotes from Film Bureau director Tong Gang.

Implementing a film ratings system is a contentious issue that has been kicking around for years, so Tong’s disclosure, if correct, has the potential to bring major changes to the domestic film industry.

Too bad it’s not true: the director did utter the words quoted in the article, but he said them in an interview with The Beijing News in 2004.

Some Newspapers and even Xinhua were deceived by the story of Beijing Business Today. They used the headline such as “China completes motion picture law, banning porn, violence contents”. Unfortunately, it seems just a clumsy copy of a five-year-old interview.

A ‘Chinese CNN’

Following the first topic in CMD 0901, Peter Ford, a staff writer of The Christian Science Monitor, quoted the comment from two Chinese scholars in his article “Beijing launching a ‘Chinese CNN’ to burnish image abroad”,

“China’s image is very important, but the first question is the image of the medium itself,” cautions Gong Wenxiang, journalism professor at Peking University. “If the medium lacks credibility, it is unthinkable that it will improve the country’s image.”

“The strength of our voice does not match our position in the world,” complains Yu Guoming, deputy dean of the journalism school at People’s University in Beijing, who has acted as a consultant on the government’s TV project.

“That affects the extent to which China is accepted by the world,” Professor Yu adds. “If our voice does not match our role, however strong we are we remain a crippled giant.”

“The outreach effort is very natural because of the growing strength of the nation,” says Professor Gong. “They [officials] are clear about what to say but they don’t know how to say it with the best results.”

And so long as the party insists on controlling the media, China will have difficulty convincing foreign viewers to consider its point of view, he adds. “They have realized the problem of cross-cultural communications, but before serious political reform takes place they cannot do much.”

Anti-anti-vulgarity Campaign: Put Clothes on Famous Paintings

Chinese Internet users angered by censorship in cyberspace have dressed up images of famous renaissance nudes in a protest against Beijing’s crackdown on ‘vulgar’ online content. The campaign of “Put Clothes on Famous Paintings” (给名画穿衣服)

Via “Protest against Web crackdown”

The protest began last week after a user of the social networking site Douban.com complained that images of several paintings, including Titian’s nude ‘Venus of Urbino’, had been deleted from an online photo album.

According to blogs on the site, Douban’s administrators had told the user that posting pornography would endanger the site’s operations.

In response, protest’s organisers asked Internet users to clothe artwork to ’save’ it from the censors, who have shut down 1,635 websites and 200 blogs in a one-month campaign against content that ‘harms public morality’.

The protest are not limited to 16th century art – one Internet user drew red underpants on the leaning, joined towers of state-run China Central Television’s headquarters in Beijing.

Also see the blog post “Chinese Netizens’ Anti-anti-vulgarity Campaign: Putting Clothes on Renaissance Paintings”.

More fancy pictures, check these blogs: Digging Pictures, Snower41.

Other Links you might be interested in

• The New York Times: Chinese Learn Limits of Online Freedom as the Filter Tightens
• Danwei: Fake commercial “expert” exposed
• China Digital Times: Yan Lieshan (鄢烈山): The Liberalization of News and the Flattening of the Society

关键词：2008, anti-vulgar, censorship, cmd, 网易, douban, 豆瓣, film rating system, Internet, kuso, Netease, SARFT, 广电总局, 低俗

相关文章

• China Media Digest 0901 (week1-4) (0)
• China Media Digest 0903 (week7) (0)
• 与时俱进的国际奥委会：奥运转播权涵盖互联网和手机+运动员blog开禁 (2)
• 如此和谐 (22)
• Simon同学，请你不要被雷到 (0)
• 赵月枝：北京奥运年的中国媒体审查与西方媒体对华报道 (2)
• 视频新规，红旗飘飘 (3)
• 风平浪静，或暗流涌动？ (3)

Chinese Media Censorship and Western Media Reporting of China in the Year of the Beijing Olympics
Yuezhi Zhao, Simon Fraser University, Canada.

在今年的奥运报道中，中国的媒体审查成为西方媒体的焦点之一。中国媒体审查的存在是毋庸置疑的，但仍然需要问：谁从中国媒体审查中获益，谁才是真正的被审查目标？

在我看来，西方的“人权十字军”和外国记者们应该超越简单的“人民与党对立”的假想。事实上，中国的审查制度在过去30年间一直是党用来辅助“改革开放”的必要手段。被审查制度压制的声音，来自那些反对将国有企业出售给本土和外国投资者的中国工人；那些在血汗工厂工作，为外国资本家产出利润，为西方消费者提供廉价商品的中国工人；也来自中国的“老革命”们和新近涌现的“毛派”人士，他们指责党的“资本主义复辟”和臣服于西方帝国主义。

世人皆知，尽管1978年“民主墙运动”有助于邓小平复出掌权，但随后对新闻出版自由的压制成为其后三十年经济改革的先决条件。1980年小平掌权后，命令将“四大自由”——即人民有权“大鸣、大放、大辩论、大字报（speak out freely, air views freely, hold great debates, and write big-character posters）”——从中国宪法（1975年版本）中抹去。

并非是要为中国媒体审查制度辩护，但我确实觉得西方媒体看待中国媒体审查的方式应该超越道德说教与反共谴责。西方也需要在其政治经济精英阶层对中国的经济利益诉求，与民主与新闻出版自由在中国的推广之间，寻求平衡与协调。

这引出我第二个观点。尽管西方媒体以其新闻出版自由为傲，但对中国受众而言，西方媒体是西方政治经济体系的一部分，更直白地说，是西方文化优越性甚至文化霸权的代理人。中国受众，尤其是青年学子和自由派知识分子，对国内审查制度早有警惕与批判。他们不仅欣赏仰慕西方的媒体自由，甚至试图将西方媒体自由及其自称的“客观公正原则”理想化。因此当他们发现西方媒体报道中的偏见甚至是种族主义色彩时，其理想的幻灭也就很自然了。我认为西方媒体在2008年初对西藏事件及奥运火炬传递的报道，对西方媒体在中国的“去魅”(disenchantment)贡献良多。这对西方媒体赢取中国公众的心灵与头脑都毫无帮助。

考虑到西方媒体及其内在逻辑，公平地说，在西方世界中部分存在着持续增长的、对世界其他国家尤其是中国的崛起的恐惧与焦虑。在此语境下，西媒对华及奥运报道也一直在帮助西方世界接受这不得不妥协与接受的、变化中的全球权力关系的地缘政治学。深陷伊拉克战争的泥沼，全球金融、石油与食品市场的难以预测的三重危机，再加上美国长期以来对中国巨大外汇储备、对美贸易顺差、高储蓄率的担忧，看起来，“猛烈抨击中国”已经成为2008北京奥运开幕之前几个月最吸引观众的“体育运动”。

事实上，西方对华关系中本来存在根深蒂固的矛盾，西媒不过是在报道中将这矛盾具象化了。一方面，西方投资者被中国市场吸引恰恰是因为后者提供了被压制性的政治环境保障的廉价劳工与低环保标准；另一方面，各人权团体又坚持政治自由与公民权利应在中国优先被考虑。当然，大多数西方媒体本身就是大产业，它们的对华报道也被其商业利益和市场驱动的新闻导向所影响。

在当下更为强化的全球化形势下，问题越发复杂了。西方大学里日益增多的中国留学生，西方国家中不断增长的华人社群，海内外华人之间通过互联网及其他全球即时通讯手段越发增强的互动，都意味着西媒不能再对华人展示其种族偏见。西媒的对华报道将面临全球华人受众的批判性审视。当西媒开始谴责中国媒体审查制度时，与日俱增的全球华人受众的声音在要求西方媒体在对中国及中国人的再现中，实践其新闻自由的同时，也勿忘责任感，以及坚持其自称的公平原则。（全文完）

关键词：2008, censorship, 笔记, 赵月枝, media

相关文章

• 专业的想象 (3)
• 一场关于Webocracy的辩论 (1)
• 李金铨：《超越西方霸权：传媒与“文化中国”的现代性》 (5)
• 旧日笔记三则 (1)
• 尼葛洛庞帝与OLPC (6)
• 听课堂报告之：搜索引擎的话语 (5)
• 后现代视野中的主体、媒介与社会——读《第二媒介时代》 (1)
• U时代的媒介研究 (5)

在google.cn上搜索“家乐福”，显示一行信息：“无法访问您所搜索的信息,请返回 google.cn 查询其它信息”。

在google.com上搜索“家乐福”，返回超过600万条结果。

上峰密令，还是自我审查？看起来似乎很明显。中国的网络管理/新闻管理/宣传管理部门，似乎并没有在西藏事件中得到任何经验教训，仍然认为屏蔽堵截，便可营造和谐盛世，天下大同。而不论你是“爱国者”还是“爱国贼”，都不被视作可以信任、可以有足够判断力和理性的公民。你只是群氓的一分子。

2008/04/27 update: 现在通过baidu.com搜索“家乐福”的结果如下图所示。

事实上如本文某条留言中所说，只要你搜索“家乐福超市”，超过600万条结果就都显示出来。这似乎更加明确地显示，这是行政命令的结果。

2008/05/03 update: 通过“北京市网监处很强很暴力”一文，找到来自《京华时报》的报道，摘抄如下：

搜索引擎搜不到“家乐福”
网监处解释称将其屏蔽 因其相关信息可能不符合相关法律法规
记者： 夏命群 | 时间： 2008-04-30

本报讯 （记者夏命群）昨天，有网友报料称，baidu、google、soso、sogou、yahoo五大搜索引擎都无法查找到家乐福的相关消息，市公安局公共信息网络安全监察处值班人员解释称，家乐福相关信息大量涉及中法关系、“藏独”等字样，可能存在涉及不符合相关法律法规的内容，所以被屏蔽了。

记者在baidu搜索网站上输入“家乐福”字样，但不管是中英文网页还是相关资讯均弹出“搜索结果可能涉及不符合相关法律法规和政策的内容，未予显示。 ” 随后记者又在google、soso、sogou、yahoo等大型搜索网站上输入“家乐福”字样，结果均是“无法访问您所搜索的信息”或者“您输入的关键词可能涉及不符合相关法律法规的内容”等。这与此前上万条“家乐福”搜索结果大相径庭。

baidu、google、sogou公司客服人员均表示，他们这两天也接到许多此类问题的反映，自己试了一遍后发现在大型搜索网站上也搜不到任何关于“家乐福”信息。对于“家乐福”被屏蔽的原因，他们均表示并不知情。

记者随后致电市公安局公共信息网络安全监察处，值班人员称，“家乐福”最近成了热门词汇，相关信息大量涉及中法关系、“藏独”等字样，可能存在涉及不符合相关法律法规的内容，所以被屏蔽了。

家乐福北方区总部相关负责人表示，他们前两天已经知道了被屏蔽的消息，建议有需求的消费者到商场内去看海报或者电话询问具体信息。

耐人寻味的是各搜索公司对此事的缄口不认，和网监处的“敢做敢当”。不过从事情后来的发展看，倒更像是fengnh在“北京市网监处很强很暴力”一文中所评论的“现代版掩耳盗铃故事”：

更荒唐的是，人民网、新浪、网易、搜狐、QQ等多家网站，先后转载了京华时报4月30日的那则报道，这些网站的相关页面随后纷纷被删除（详情见百度新闻搜索记录，这个记录上的人民网、新浪等页面已不复存在），看来，北京市网监处既想控制网络舆论，又不想落下痕迹，授人以柄，成为众矢之的。

好一个现代版掩耳盗铃的故事。

关键词：censorship, 百度, Internet, 家乐福, 屏蔽

相关文章

• 什么也连不上 (10)
• 与时俱进的SEO：Search Engine Omission？ (28)
• China Media Digest 0903 (week7) (0)
• China Media Digest 0902 (week5-6) (1)
• 互联网让你孤独了吗？ (13)
• 举而报之·清洁一切·我们都是bubble boy～ (2)
• 中国网民创造的价值在哪里 (3)
• 中美青少年在线生活经验之对比 (6)